Overall Findings including for Different 'Run a risk Profiles'

For young people in full general, research shows that common formal mentoring program models (community-based mentoring, grouping mentoring, and cross-historic period peer mentoring) that develop strong mentoring relationships tin yield positive effects for mentees. Meta-analyses report small-scale, modest positive outcomes for youth comparable to other similar, well-adult formal interventions with youth.1 These outcomes relate to positive bookish, emotional, behavioural and social development, including:

  • Mentor-Mentee Matchincreasing conviction, healthy self-esteem and respect in mentees;
  • developing more positive attitudes, values and behavior;
  • developing the capacity to see other options and to brand positive choices;
  • promoting more than pro-social behaviour;
  • improving emotional well-being;
  • improving attendance in schoolhouse and academic accomplishment in some areas;
  • developing the ability to recollect constructively and positively about the future; and
  • defining short- and longer-term goals.i, 2, three, iv, 5

At that place are too benefits for mentors, which can include:

  • the satisfaction of being useful to someone else;
  • the pleasure from contributing to positive change in the mentee;
  • improved listening, communication and leadership skills;
  • better understanding of young people and the problems they face;
  • the satisfaction of making a difference;
  • personal growth through relating across economic, social, cultural, and personal differences; and
  • the recognition and gratitude of teachers, staff, and parents.iii

The bear witness is less common, conclusive or definitive for the overall effectiveness of mentoring for youth accounted at higher-take a chance of negative life outcomes. The first big-scale, rigorous study of how varying youth risk profiles affect a mentoring human relationship and outcomes was conducted by Herrera, DuBois and Grossman in 2013.

The report reveals that:

  • Youth with different levels and types of risk profiles had mentoring relationships that were similar in strength and in duration, and experienced similar positive benefits from participating in mentoring.
  • The challenges reported by mentors and the reasons matches ended prematurely differed in relation to the youth's chance contour.
  • The strongest and near consistent benefit for youth regardless of their risk profile was a reduction in symptoms of depression (where near 25% of youth reported depressive symptoms at intake). Noteworthy improvements were also made across risk profiles in social acceptance, bookish attitudes and grades.
  • At that place was a trend toward somewhat stronger and more than consistent benefits for youth who were relatively high on private risk but not on ecology risk.
  • No pregnant improvements were found beyond risk profiles in the areas of positive or negative behaviours, and relationships with parents.
  • Mentors with early match training and consequent match support throughout the program met more than often with their mentee, and had longer-lasting mentoring relationships. Mentees' ratings of the quality of their mentoring relationship also coincided with the level of training their mentor had received.6

Finally, the researchers propose that mentoring programs may be well-nigh constructive when they support youth who experience relatively loftier levels of individual gamble (challenging behaviours, academic struggle, pregnant health needs), simply information technology may be less constructive when supporting bothg individual and ecology gamble factors (due east.g., poverty, unsafe housing, low parental support).

"Don't tell youth they are high-take chances, even "youth" is patronizing. Participants is ideal." (Covenant House Youth Consultation)

The Effectiveness of Mentoring for:

a. Youth with Academic Challenges

There are alien results nearly the impact of mentoring for youth with academic challenges, maybe due to the fact that virtually mentoring that has been evaluated focuses on relationships equally opposed to academics. However, various studies have found positive (low to moderate) impacts on academic outcomes resulting from mentoring interventions (i.e., achievement and driblet-out).7 Many researchers have pointed out that relationship building can lead to positive results in other areas of the young person's life.

Mentoring for youth with bookish challenges should begin with a relationship Not bookish back up/ tutoring.8, 9

b. Youth In or Leaving Care

Adequate mentoring can have many positive outcomes for youth in or leaving intendance, including reduced mental health symptoms and more stable living environments.ten, 11 Data and research regarding the use of mentoring programs with youth in or leaving care is at an early stage.47 Systematic inquiry is minimal in this surface area; electric current inquiry is primarily qualitative studies with pocket-size samples and private evaluations of programs.12 These studies indicate positive impacts on interpersonal skills, salubrious relationship skills, self-esteem, independent living skills, and high school completion.45, 48, 49 More than information is needed on how mentee characteristics, including time spent in care and the types of adverse experiences, may influence the outcomes of a mentoring relationship, too as what dosage of mentoring is required to produce positive outcomes for youth in care.

Interest in mentoring for youth in or leaving care is growing. Regime of Alberta Human Services recently funded the Children and Youth in Care and Mentoring Projection in partnership with three mentoring agencies to increase the number of children and youth in intendance with access to a mentor.

Program staff and mentors should work hard to sustain matches because early match termination is a high risk for youth with transient lifestyles and experiences of abuse, such every bit youth in or leaving care.12

c. Youth Involved with the Criminal Justice Organization

Inquiry is promising but not conclusive on the impacts of mentoring for youth involved in the criminal justice organisation.7 Ane systematic review found moderate positive outcomes overall for mentoring programs on the prevention of youth aggression, drug utilise, and criminalization.13, xiv Another systematic review constitute that when mentoring was offered in combination with other re-entry supports, re-offending rates for youth following release were somewhat lower (small to moderate result).thirteen, 14, 15, 16, 17

Farther research is required to determine:

  1. Whether mentoring is effective at reducing criminalization as a stand up-alone strategy or as a part of a larger strategy with other interventions (employment, counseling, and/or tutoring) requires farther research; and
  2. At which stage of youth involvement in the criminal justice organisation mentoring is most effective (i.e., pre-abort, diversion, postal service-arrest, reintegration).7

d. Youth with Mental Health Needs

In that location is limited research in the field of mentoring for youth with mental health needs. In the literature that exists, mentoring was found to be a promising intervention when supported by a mental health team.18 Some research has found that youth with mental health needs with a mentor are more likely to go involved with, successfully participate, and stay in treatment.xix

Mentors are not mental health professionals, although they may need to assist in times of crunch. Thus, they should receive rigorous preparation in crisis response and have information nigh resources in the community to refer the mentee.20

east. Newcomer Youth

Mentoring can provide positive social relationships and help the young person integrate into their new culture and decrease negative mental health symptoms.21, 22

f. Youth with Substance Apply Problems

There is promising evidence that mentoring tin take modest effects on the prevention of youth substance apply. Withal, best practices in this area are less clear. Some research suggests that where community-based mentoring occurred for more than 12 months, there was a direct touch on on reducing the frequency of substance apply, improvements in how adolescents perceived their relationships with their parents, improvements in peer relationships, and higher youth self-worth.7

thousand. Youth with Developmental or Other Disabilities

Mentoring can help normalize a disability, which may not simply help the immature person experience more than able, just likewise aid them develop a positive inability identity.23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29

One promising strategy for youth with disabilities is online mentoring every bit it may be a safer, more accessible place to connect.23, 29, 30

Matching youth with disabilities to mentors with similar disabilities can assist the mentee in learning skills for self-efficacy and contained living.

h. Homeless Youth

There is minimal data bachelor about mentoring with homeless youth. Similarly, at that place are alien results about its impact.31, 32, 33, 34These results may exist due to the fact that information technology is more hard to sustain formal mentoring with young people living transient lifestyles and thus the mentoring relationship may not have adequate fourth dimension to develop and elicit positive results.35

i. Indigenous Youth

The effectiveness of mentoring for Indigenous youth has not been studied in-depth. However, a few elements take been found to make mentoring more successful for Indigenous youth, including: focusing on natural mentoring instead of formalized matching; using a pocket-sized grouping mentoring approach instead of one-on-i matching; ensuring cultural appropriateness of program activities; and finally matching based on similarities and respect for differences.36, 37, 38

j. Racialized Youth

Mentoring for racialized youth targeting academic challenges has been found to have multiple positive effects. Following a school-based mentoring intervention, racialized youth had ameliorate grades and greater perceived teacher back up, school belonging, conclusion making, and were less likely to be involved with school disciplinary system.39, 40 Cross- or same-race matching can make a significant difference of outcomes, although the research is alien. Mentees in cross-race matches were less likely to begin using alcohol than those in same-race matches, yet boys in same-race matches had meliorate educational competence and cocky-esteem than those in cantankerous-race matches.41

thousand. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Pansexual, 2 Spirit, and Asexual Youth

There is a large gap in the research about mentoring for LGBTTQQIP2SA youth. Peradventure this is due to the limited mentoring programming available for LGBTTQQIP2SA youth, which may be rooted in systemic discrimination and poor handling of multifariousness issues.42

50. Girls

Longer lasting relationships are important for success in mentoring girls as opposed to boys.43 At that place are conflicting results about the importance of same-gender matching for program effectiveness. Some research has found potential benefits of aforementioned-gender matching, while ii meta-analyses did not find evidence for increased effectiveness of aforementioned-gender matching.44

  1. DuBois, D., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J., Silverthorn, N. & Valentine, J. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the show. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91.
  2. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Customs Psychology, thirty, 157-197.
  3. Davis, R.R. & Fagans, G.P. (n.d.). NPS Mentorship Program: Making the Difference! Norfolk, VA: Norfolk Public Schools.
  4. Rhodes, J. E. & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Agreement and Facilitating the Youth Mentoring Movement. Social Policy Report, Vol. XX, Number III, three-nineteen.
  5. Wheeler, M.Eastward., Keller, T.E., & DuBois, D.Fifty. (2010). Review of three recent randomized trials of schoolhouse-based mentoring. Social Policy Report, 24(three), 1–21.
  6. Herrera, C., DuBois, D. L., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). The function of risk: Mentoring experiences and outcomes for youth with varying run a risk profiles. New York, NY: Public/ Private Ventures project distributed by MDRC.
  7. The Indiana Youth Found (2013). Youth Mentoring: All-time Practices, Quality Standards and Evidence-Based Model Programs. Indianapolis: The Indiana Youth Plant. Retrieved from world wide web.iyi.org/resources/mentor/pdf/IYI-Mentoring-All-time-Practices-2013.pdf
  8. Cannata, A., Garringer, Grand., MacRae, P., & Wakeland, D. (2005). Making the course. A guide to incorporating academic achievement into mentoring programs and relationships. Folsom, CA: U.S. Department of Education, Mentoring Resource Centre.
  9. Larose, S., & Tarabulsy, G. Thousand. (2013). Academically at-risk students. In In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 301-315). Yard Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  10. Garringer, M. (2011). "It may be the missing piece" – Exploring the mentoring of youth in systems of intendance. 2011 Summer Plant on Youth Mentoring. National Mentoring Heart. Retrieved from http://albertamentors.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Mentoring-Youth-in- Care.pdf
  11. Taussig, H. Northward., & Culhane, S. Due east. (2010). Impact of mentoring and skills group program on mental wellness outcomes for maltreated children in foster intendance. Archives of Pediatrics and Boyish Medicine, 164(8), 739-746.
  12. Britner, P. A., Randall, M. Thousand., & Ahrens, K. R. (2014). Youth in foster care. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 341-355). K Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  13. Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, G., & Bass, A. (2008). Mentoring interventions to affect juvenile delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, sixteen(10).
  14. Tolan, P. H., Henry, D. B., Schoeny, M. Southward., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, Due east. (2014). Mentoring   programs to impact delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review. Periodical of Experimental Criminology, 10(2), 179-206.
  15. Abrams, L. S., Mizel, 1000. L, Nguyen, V., & Shlonksy, A. (2014). Juvenile reentry and aftercare interventions: Is mentoring a promising management? Periodical of Evidence-Based Social Piece of work, xi(4), 404-422.
  16. Miller, J. M., Miller, H. V., Barnes, J. C., Clark, P. A., Jones, M. A., Quiros, R. J., & Peterson, S. (2012a). Referring youth in juvenile justice settings to mentoring programs: Effective strategies and practices to improving the mentoring experience for at-risk and loftier-risk youth. A resource compendium. Part of Juvenile Justice and Malversation Prevention.Retrieved from http://www.mentoring.org/images/uploads/Periodical%20Article.pdf
  17. Waller, K. S., Houchins, D. East., & Nomvete, P. T. (2010). Establishing a school-based mentoring programme for youth who are transitioning from a secure facility. Beyond Beliefs, 19(3), 30-35.
  18. Leahy, M., & Robb, C. (2013). Edifice a better schoolhouse environment for youth with mental health and addiction issues. The New Mentality, & Children'due south Mental Health Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.kidsmentalhealth.ca/documents/res-building-a-amend-school-surroundings-for-youth-with-mental-health-and-addiction-issuesv2.pdf
  19. Kerr, D. C. R., & King, C. A. (2013). Youth with mental health needs. In D. L. DuBois & K. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 325-341). Chiliad Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  20. Munson, M. R., Brownish, S., Spencer, R., Edguer, Thou., & Tracy, E. (2015). Supportive relationships among former system youth with mental health challenges. Journal of Boyish Research, 30(4), 501-529.
  21. Birman, D., Weinstein, T., Chan, W. Y., & Beehler, S. (2007). Immigrant youth in U.S. schools: Opportunities for prevention. The Prevention Researcher, 14(four), fourteen-17.
  22. Yeh, C. J., Ching, A. One thousand., Okubo, Y., & Luthar, Southward. Southward. (2007). Development of a mentoring program for Chinese immigrant adolescents'' cultural adjustment. Adolescence, 42(168), 733-747.
  23. Axelrod, E., Campbell, Thousand., & Holt, T. (2005). The best practices guide in mentoring youth with disabilities. Partners for Youth with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.pyd.org/editor/images/resource-best-practices-for-mentoring-youth-with-disabilities.pdf.pdf
  24. Bong, Due east. C. (2012). Mentoring transition-age youth with blindness. The Journal of Special Teaching, 46(3), 170-179.
  25. MENTOR. (2015). Elements of constructive exercise for mentoring, 4th ed. Retrieved from http://www.mentoring.org/new-site/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/Final_Elements_Publication_Fourth.pdf
  26. Journey, B. J., & Loukas, 1000. M. (2009). Adolescents with inability in schoolhouse-based practice: Psychosocial intervention recommendations for a successful journey to adulthood. Periodical of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early on Intervention, two(2), 119-132.
  27. Powers, L. E., Sowers, J., & Stevens, T. (1995). An exploratory, randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and customs-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation, 61(1), p. 33-41.
  28. Shem, One thousand., Medel, R., Wright, J., Kolakowsky-Hayner, Due south. A., & Duong, T. (2011). Render to work and school: A model mentoring plan for youth and immature adults with spinal string injury. Spinal Cord, 49(four), 544-548.
  29. Burgstahler, S. (2012). Opening doors: Mentoring on the net. E-mentoring and individuals with disabilities. University of Washington. Retrieved from http://world wide web.washington.edu/doit/opening-doors-mentoring-net
  30. Snowden, R. (2003). Partners for youth with disabilities. American Rehabilitation, 36-41.
  31. Bartle-Haring, S., Slesnick, N., Collins, J., Erdem, Grand., & Buettner, C. (2012). The utility of mentoring homeless  adolescents: A pilot study. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38(4), 350-358.
  32. Dang, M. T., Conger, Chiliad. J., Breslau, J., Miller, E. (2014). Exploring protective factors among homeless youth: The role of natural mentors. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 25(3), 1121-1138.
  33. Greenlee, J., Henson, A., Jones, 50., Vance, M. F., Wilson, P. (2013). Developing a mentor plan for unaccompanied homeless youth. School of Social Work Customs Projects. Newspaper 2.
  34. Stewart, M., Reutter, 50., & Letourneau, N. (2007). Support intervention for homeless youths. Canadian Journal Of Nursing Research, 39(3), 203-207.
  35. Karabanow, J., & Clement, P. (2004). Interventions with street youth: A commentary on the practice-based inquiry literature. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(1), 93-108.
  36. Klinck, J., Cardinal, C., Edwards, Chiliad., Gibson, North., Bisanz, J., & da Costa, J. (2005). Mentoring programs for Ancient youth. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 3, 109–130.
  37. Sinclair, R., & Pooyak, S. (2007). Aboriginal mentoring in Saskatoon: A cultural perspective. Indigenous Peoples' Health Research Centre and Big Brothers Big Sisters of Saskatoon. Retrieved from http://iphrc.ca/pub/documents/mentorship_final_july30.pdf
  38. Ware, V. (2013). Endmost the gap clearinghouse: Mentoring programs for Ethnic youth at take chances. Australian Government, Australian Found of Health and Welfare, and Australian Institute of Family unit Studies, Resources Sheet No. 22. Retrieved from  http://www.aihw.gov.au/uploadedFiles/ClosingTheGap/Content/Publications/2013/ctgc-rs22.pdf
  39. Gordon, D. M., Iwamoto, D., Ward, Northward., Potts, R., & Boyd, E. (2009). Mentoring urban Black eye-school male students: Implications for bookish accomplishment. Journal of Negro Instruction, 78(three), 277-289.
  40. Holt, J., Bry, B. H., & Johnson, 5. L. (2008). Enhancing school engagement in at-risk, urban minority adolescents through a school-based adult mentoring intervention. Kid & Family Beliefs Therapy, 30(4), 297-318.
  41. Rhodes, J. East., Reddy, R., Grossman, J. B., & Lee, J. 1000. (2002). Volunteer mentoring relationships with minority youth: An assay of same- versus cantankerous-race matches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(10), 2114-2133.
  42. Gastic, B., & Johnson, D. (2009). Teacher-mentors and the educational resilience of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 21(ii-iii), 219-231.
  43. Liang, B., Bogat, G. A., & Duffy, Due north. (2014). Gender in mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 159-175). K Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  44. Darling, N., Bogat, Grand. A., Cavell, T. A., Potato, S. E., & Sánchez, B. (2006). Gender, ethnicity, and hazard: Mentoring and the consideration of individual differences. Periodical of Community Psychology, 34(6), 765-779.
  45. Ahrens, K.R., DuBois, D.Fifty., Garrison, M., Spencer, R., Richardson, 50.P. & Lozano, P. (2011). Qualitative exploration of relationships with important non-parental adults in the lives of youth in foster intendance. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1012-1023.
  46. Britner, P.A., Randall, K.Thousand. & Ahrens, Thousand.R. (2013). Youth in Foster Intendance. In D.L. DuBois & M.J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (2 ed., pp. 341-354). One thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
  47. Collins, Yard. (2004). Enhancing services to youth leaving foster care: Analysis of recent Legislation and its potential impact. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(11), 1051-1065.
  48. Collins, Thousand.E., Spencer, R. & Ward, R. (2010). Supporting youth in the transition from foster Intendance:  Formal and informal connections. Child Welfare, 89, 125-143.
  49. Osterling, K.L. & Hines, A.G. (2006). Mentoring boyish foster youth: promoting resilience during developmental transitions. Child and Family Social Piece of work, xi, 242-253.

Contents [Show/Hide]